Cases 61 - 70 of 9,335
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
as 3:2024cv07699
Respondent:
KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
as 3:2024cv07700
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. LACONTI MASONRY, INC.
as 3:2024cv07704
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
LACONTI MASONRY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. CCL CONSTRUCTION LLC
as 3:2024cv07701
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
CCL CONSTRUCTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. CW Piping LLC
as 8:2024cv01994
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments, Extended Benefit Fund and Industry Advancement Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Metal Trades Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
CW Piping LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 BENEFIT FUNDS v. SD CONCRETE CORPORATION
as 3:2024cv07519
Respondent:
SD CONCRETE CORPORATION
Petitioner:
TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 BENEFIT FUNDS
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Certified Crane Services, Inc.
as 2:2024cv05619
Defendant:
Certified Crane Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Southern California IBEW-NECA Administrative Corporation, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Victory Fire Protection LLC
as 8:2024cv01866
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the Sprinkler Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 Work Assessments, Extended Benefit Fund and Industry Advancement Fund and others
Defendant:
Victory Fire Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund et al v. Melson Contracting LLC
as 2:2024cv00802
Defendant:
Melson Contracting LLC
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Operating Engineers Skill Improvement and Apprenticeship Fund, Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers, Operating Engineers Local 139 Defined Contribution Annuity Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
Demopoulos v. United Metro Energy Corp.
as 24-1684
Defendant:
UNITED METRO ENERGY CORP., United Apollo Petroleum Transportation Corp. and United Apollo Transportation Corp.
Plaintiff:
DEMOS P. DEMOPOULOS, as Trustee and Fiduciary of the Local 553 Pension Fund, Local 553 Deferred Compensation Fund and Local 553 Benefits Fund, VICTOR CASTELLANO, as Trustee and Fiduciary of the Local 553 Pension Fund, Local 553 Deferred Compensation Fund and Local 553 Benefits Fund, STEVEN GOLDMAN, as Trustee and Fiduciary of the Local 553 Pension Fund, Local 553 Deferred Compensation Fund and Local 553 Benefits Fund and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
