Cases 61 - 70 of 422
Warren v. Goldner, et al
as 1:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Martha Warren
Defendant:
Brooke Goldner and Thomas Tadlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks v. Felts et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Felts, Correctional Officer Coleman, Correctional Officer Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00939
Petitioner:
Anthony Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Brooks v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02725
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Kenneth Southerland, D. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Claiborne County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
RB, Joe Baker and Pam Baker
Defendant:
Claiborne County, Tennessee, Bob Brooks, Kenneth Joseph Ochoa, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. Blair et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
C. Blair, T. Smith, T. Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2021cv02679
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hutzler et al v. Nuclear Security, LLC (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hutzler, Chad Acres, Chelsea Adkisson and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
