Cases 61 - 70 of 274
Grunden v. Precision Air & Plumbing Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00477
Defendant:
Erik J Bryan, Precision Air & Plumbing Incorporated and Gina M Bryan
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Grunden
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chagolla et al v. Cluff et al
as 2:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Todd Bates, Bryan Cluff and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Chagolla and Jackie Chagolla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schenk #325642 v. Coleman et al
as 2:2019cv05898
Defendant:
Bryan Lessman and Anthony Coleman
Plaintiff:
Wesley Allan Schenk, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graff #226507 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2019cv00588
Petitioner:
Bryan Scott Graff
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boigris v. EWC P&T LLC
as 2:2019mc00041
Petitioner:
EWC P&T LLC
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com LLC
Plaintiff:
Bryan Boigris
Hernandez #242848 v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05623
Defendant:
Eric Miner, Unknown Williamson, Kim Seagraves and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Ted Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Bryan et al
as 2:2019cv05409
Defendant:
Sharon M Delacueva, Cecilia Bryan, Cassandra Bryan and others
Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Heward et al v. Thahab
as 2:2019cv05155
Plaintiff:
Alysia Dawn Heward and Duane Bryan Heward
Defendant:
Ahmed Thahab
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Vanu LLC v. Foster et al
as 2:2019cv05146
Defendant:
Stephanie Foster, Bryan Scott Foster and Stephanie Landrum
Plaintiff:
Vanu LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roundtree et al v. Maricopa County Special Health District Board of Directors
as 2:2019cv04813
Defendant:
Dr Alan Rawls, Ted Williams, Teresa Cordeiro and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila T Roundtree, Cyera Roundtree, Adrianna Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
