Cases 61 - 70 of 2,320
State of West Virginia, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 24-10679
Petitioner:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Respondent:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Richard Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6077
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Grasty v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Grasty
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Artis Denard Johnson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
Burgess v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Earl Dushawn Burgess
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6075
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Armstrong v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Emporia Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spiker, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
George H. Spiker, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
