Cases 61 - 70 of 121
The Cadle Company v. Bray et al
as 4:2010cv02789
Plaintiff:
The Cadle Company
Defendant:
Larry Steven Bray and Thomas Bray
Counter_claimant:
Larry Steven Bray
Counter_defendant:
The Cadle Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Joseph Reisinger v. County of Luzerne, et al
as 10-3232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH R. REISINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LUZERNE, LUZERNE COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU, MARY DYSLESKI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03182
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
In re: John S. Mazella
as 1:2010cv05506
Defendant:
John S. Mazella , Tri County Mobile MRI LP and Eastern Magnetic Imaging
Plaintiff:
The Cadle Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reisinger v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2010cv00987
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Reisinger
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Luzerne County Tax Claim Bureau, Mary Dysleski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Cadle Company v. Staunton et al
as 3:2010cv00775
Plaintiff:
The Cadle Company
Garnishee:
Heather Staunton and Jonathan E Neubauer
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00576
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Joseph Reisinger v. County of Luzerne, et al
as 10-1731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH REISINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LUZERNE, LUZERNE COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU, MARY DYSLESKI and others
Ohlson v. The Cadle Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2004cv03418
Defendant:
Bobby D. Associates, Daniel C. Cadle, John Doe and others
Counter Claimant:
John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Counter Defendant:
Paul Ohlson and Paul Ohlson
Plaintiff:
Paul Ohlson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
