Cases 61 - 70 of 233
Hunter v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv04042
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, President of the U S Donald Trump, Andrew M Saul and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00234
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Miller
Respondent:
Elbert County District Court, State of Colorado and Iowa Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fisher v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00209
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Fisher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
King et al v. Skinner et al
as 4:2020cv00175
Plaintiff:
Mark B. Retterath and Christopher L. King
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility, Beth Skinner, Clarinda Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inman v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Jeff Panken, Christopher Hobb, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Allen Inman
Interested Party:
William A Hill and William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Kinkead et al
as 1:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Sean Kinkead and Christopher Carton
Plaintiff:
Shashona Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00006
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Derrick Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Miller v. Salvation Army et al
as 4:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Aaron Rodriguez, Salvation Army, Christopher Chiodo and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Miller, Jr.
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
