Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Goett et al v. Wade et al
as 2:2009cv01935
Plaintiff:
Vincent Goett, Melissa Goett and The Markers Companies LLC
Defendant:
Ronald Wade, Brenda Wade, Mitch Brinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cohen v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv01888
Petitioner:
Leslie Charles Cohen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nothum et al v. Arizona Bank and Trust et al
as 2:2008cv01365
Plaintiff:
David M. Nothum, Glenette Nothum, Richard Nothum and others
Defendant:
Arizona Bank and Trust and Scott B. Cohen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Traylor v. Avnet, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00918
Defendant:
Avnet Incorporated and Avnet Pension Plan
Plaintiff:
Kevin R Moses, Levanna C Traylor, Gwyn M Moriarty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cohen v. West Asset Management, Inc
as 2:2007cv01075
Plaintiff:
Adam Harris Cohen
Defendant:
West Asset Management, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cohen v. General Revenue Corporation
as 2:2007cv01074
Plaintiff:
Adam Harris Cohen
Defendant:
General Revenue Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cohen v. General Revenue Corporation
as 2:2007cv01057
Plaintiff:
Adam Harris Cohen
Defendant:
General Revenue Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEC v. Dillie, et al
as 2:2001cv02493
Receiver:
Lawrence J Warfield
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Thirdparty_defendant:
Louis B Kaplan, Lawrence J Warfield , Ronald Moskowitz and others
Claimant:
Missouri Revenue, Department of
Movant:
California Reconveyance Company , MGM Grand Hotel Inc , Jack J Hetherington and others
Counter_claimant:
Louis B Kaplan
Counter_defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Louis B Kaplan
Cross_defendant:
Lawrence J Warfield
Intervenor:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
