Cases 61 - 70 of 122
Tony Horton v. Corizon Incorporated, et al
as 17-16162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY L. HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON INCORPORATED, CHRISTINA ARMENTA, LUCY BURCIAGA, AKA Lucy Burcapa, Dr., AKA Lucy Burcpa and others
Richard Richards v. USDC-AZT
as 17-71569
:
In re: RICHARD L. RICHARDS
Petitioner:
RICHARD L. RICHARDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest:
CORIZON INCORPORATED, CHRISTINE L. ARMENTA, DAVID ROBERTSON and others
Carlson et al v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01490
Plaintiff:
Eric Carlson and Elfie Blair-Carlson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated , Corizon Incorporated , Corizon LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edmo v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Adree Edmo
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Kevin Kempf, Richard Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acuna v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00816
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Villalobos Acuna
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BeJaran v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00754
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Charles L Ryan, Chris Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse E BeJaran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00536
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudisill v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Rudisill
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Tamara Porter, Lisa Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04080
Plaintiff:
Rick Powell
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Joanna Grafton, Chris Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04027
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Smith
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Charles Ryan and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
