Cases 61 - 70 of 164
Shawn Albin v. San Diego County Sheriff Med., et al
as 16-56813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN M. ALBIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Medical Director, SDCJ CLINIC MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Clinic Medical Director, SDCJ MD OF 6/23/14, Medical Doctor and others
Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Fort Roofing & Sheet Metal Works Inc et al
as 4:2016cv03700
Plaintiff:
Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Fort Roofing & Sheet Metal Works Inc, Emily D Patterson and Weston Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 16-16765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, R. S. LAMBERT, Chief Deputy Warden, J. MAHONEY, Psy. D and others
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Lewaro Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00622
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lewaro Construction, Inc., Lewaro Interiors, Inc., Raymond Jackson Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Leo Patterson
as 16-14484
Petitioner:
In re: LEO D. PATTERSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Timberland v. Mascarenas et al
as 1:2016cv00922
Plaintiff:
Ronald Timberland
Defendant:
G. Mascarenas, D. Patterson, J. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Leo Patterson
as 16-12492
Petitioner:
In re: LEO D. PATTERSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Norice D Patterson v. Randy Grounds
as 2:2016cv03274
Respondent:
Randy Grounds
Petitioner:
Norice D. Patterson
USA v. Luke Patterson
as 15-4183
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LUKE D. PATTERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
