Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Nicholas Benipayo et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2015cv04314
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Benipayo , Mark Carnett , Daniel Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Aragon et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05631
Plaintiff:
Mark Aragon, Anthony Ares, Cheryl Armour and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
United States v. Robinson
as 13-3283
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RISHEEN DANIEL ROBINSON
Robinson v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in Criminal Case No. 10-40037 ONLY***
as 5:2013cv04099
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Risheen Daniel Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J & J ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
J & J ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Defendant:
DANIEL ROBINSON and MARY ANN ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
ROBINSON et al v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv05065
Plaintiff:
MARYANN ROBINSON and DANIEL ROBINSON
Defendant:
S.W. KROUT, INC. , NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Archuletta v. Martinez, et al.
as 1:2012cv00732
Defendant:
Daniel Robinson, Cornelius Foxworth , Yancy Moseley and others
Plaintiff:
Juanita Archuletta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WESTFAHL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011cv02210
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WESTFAHL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DANIEL THAU, DANIEL ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Robinson
as 11-3004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RISHEEN DANIEL ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
