Cases 61 - 64 of 64
USA, et al v. USDC-ORE
as 17-71692
:
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, SHAUN DONOVAN and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director o fthe Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Real Party In Interest:
KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK and others
State of Hawaii, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-15589
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII and ISMAIL ELSHIKH
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, ALLAN HAKKY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
