Cases 61 - 70 of 1,010
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RANEY v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
DENNIS TYRONE RANEY
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUGGLE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
BRYAN TUGGLE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE and OBADIAH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GRAY and LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FITTS v. QUAKENBUSH et al
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
SHANNA CHEATHAM FITTS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, SERGEANT PATRICK CLENNON, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHANNON v. KELLE et al
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Defendant:
KELLE, JUGG, MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
