Cases 61 - 70 of 796
Parmlee v. Revenue Sevices
as 3:2021cv01295
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Parmlee
Defendant:
State of Connecticut Department of Revenue Services and Dept. of Revenue Sevices
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parmlee v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2021cv01294
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Parmlee
Defendant:
Office of Attorney General and Dept. of Revenue Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parmlee v. Revenue Sevices
as 3:2021cv01292
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Parmlee, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept. Revenue Sevices
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jean-Baptiste v. Savage et al
as 3:2021cv01229
Plaintiff:
Oles Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
Stacie Savage, Montville Police Dept and Town of Montville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roundtree et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv01199
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree, Chloe Palmer and Tykeese Palmer
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Manchester Police Dept, Connecticut Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciriello v. Judicial Branch et al
as 3:2021cv01185
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Ciriello
Defendant:
Judicial Branch, Dept Of Education, Dept of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Milner v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv01058
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Connecticut Dept. of Correction, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knighton v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00765
Defendant:
Feder, Nigal Rodney, Mallory Muzykaski and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Knighton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keels v. Richards et al
as 3:2021cv00751
Defendant:
Wtby, Police Department, Michale Richards and Waterbury Police Dept
Plaintiff:
James Keels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
