Cases 61 - 70 of 118
Williams v. State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00153
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Phil Bryant, Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Central Review Board et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00621
Plaintiff:
Leon Lamar McGhee
Defendant:
Central Review Board and Director of Classification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01278
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carey v. Director of Central Review Board et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Director of Central Review Board, Director of Board of Pardons and Paroles, Joshua Beaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson v. McDaniels et al (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
James Stinson
Defendant:
Dianca McDaniels and Director Division of Motor Vehicles State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giovanni v. Homeland Security & Immigration & Customs Enforcement
as 4:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
Edwin Retana Giovanni
Defendant:
Director of Dept of Homeland Security & Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00009
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:14cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burnette v. Veterans Administration Healthcare, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2014cv00660
Plaintiff:
William Randall Burnette
Defendant:
Veterans Administration Healthcare, VAMC Director and VMAC Police Chief
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
