Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Lines v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00893
Respondent:
John Doe, 3, Tenet Concepts, LLC, Amazon.Com Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lines
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 1:2018mc00647
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 6:2018mc00219
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Stalons et al v. Houston Chronical et al
as 4:2018cv02453
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 5, Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Stalons Betty, Richard Stalons and Betty Stalons
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
McCormick v. Schmaderer et al
as 3:2018cv01141
Plaintiff:
Melvin McCormick
Defendant:
Todd Schmaderer, John Doe, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washpon v. Jane/John Does 1 et al
as 6:2018cv00051
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Department, Brazos County Sheriff Department, City of Austin, TX and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Julie Washpon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burnett v. Warden John Doe 4 et al
as 4:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Leon Thomas Burnett
Defendant:
Warden John Doe 4, John Doe 1 White, John Doe 2 Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2017cv02750
Plaintiff:
Rodney John Ramirez
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1, John/Jane Doe #2, John/Jane Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kharb, Praveen v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00619
Plaintiff:
Praveen Kharb
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc, John Doe 1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Taylor County et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ken David Scott
Defendant:
Taylor County, TX, Ricky Bishop, Taylor County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
