Cases 61 - 67 of 67
Dae Won Food U.S.A., Inc. v. Spatz et al
as 0:2009cv02820
Plaintiff:
Dae Won Food U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Donald Dean Spatz, Matrix Associates, Inc. and MGI Grain Processing, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Matrix Associates, Inc., Donald Dean Spatz and MGI Grain Processing, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Dae Won Food U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Jordan v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17532
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean Jordan, Donald Dean Jordan, Donald Dean Jordan and others
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, Illinois Tool Works Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HAGEMANN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86505
Plaintiff:
DONALD DEAN HAGEMANN
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Donald Dean & Sons, Inc. v. Xonitek Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean & Sons, Inc. and Donald Dean & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Xonitek Systems Corporation and Xonitek Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EGBERT et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66586
Plaintiff:
DONALD DEAN EGBERT and CYNTHIA EGBERT
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
USA v. Rowell
as 07-10702
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD DEAN ROWELL
Wedekind et al v. United Behavioral Health et al
as 1:2007cv00026
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean Wedekind, Donald Dean Wedekind, Donald Dean Wedekind and others
Defendant:
United Behavioral Health, United Behavioral Health, United Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
