Cases 61 - 70 of 287
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Allen v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of et al
as 6:2019cv01273
Defendant:
James Pavilion, Edward E. Evans, Michael R. Dayton and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Allen
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grabbe v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2019cv02518
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Kyle Edward Victor Grabbe
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dembry v. English
as 5:2019cv03162
Petitioner:
Edward Keith Dembry
Respondent:
(fnu) English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solton v. Hurde et al
as 5:2019cv03158
Defendant:
Anna Jumpponen, (fnu) Miller, (fnu) Todd and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Solton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Giambelluca et al
as 2:2019cv02293
Defendant:
Samual Giambelluca, Sharp One INC and Sharp One, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Floyd E Ross and Floyd Edward Ross, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Edwards v. Michel et al
as 2:2019cv02290
Plaintiff:
Tyrece L. Edwards
Defendant:
Kennedy Berkley Yarnevich Williamson and Lawrence G. Michel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Elmer v USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. All filings to be made in criminal case 08-20033-KHV.
as 2:2019cv02231
Plaintiff:
USA
Petitioner:
Norman Edward Elmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pfuetze v. Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas et al
as 6:2019cv01112
Defendant:
Edward G. Naasz, Cherokee, County of, Tonya Reed and others
Plaintiff:
John Pfuetze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Upton
as 5:2019cv03078
Petitioner:
Connie Edwards
Respondent:
Jody R. Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
