Cases 61 - 70 of 118
Rose et al v. Pribil et al
as 3:2015cv08150
Plaintiff:
Donald Rose, Virginia Rose and Donald Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
William B Pribil, Cameron Stoppe, Joseph Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Ryan et al
as 3:2015cv08119
Petitioner:
Michael Gerrod Ellis
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swinton v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv00794
Plaintiff:
Ellis Jerome Swinton, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCleve #177261 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02615
Plaintiff:
James Baxter McCleve
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dirt Sports LLC et al
as 3:2014cv08223
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Dirt Sports LLC, Brian Wayne Worton, Michelle Ore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv02417
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Byron C Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pittman v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv01665
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Ellis Eugene Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pittman v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv01637
Plaintiff:
Ellis Eugene Pittman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Semco Management Incorporated et al
as 4:2014cv02129
Plaintiff:
Colleen Miller
Defendant:
Semco Management Incorporated, Dan Ellis, Tucson Endocrine Associates PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
