Cases 61 - 70 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jasmaine f/k/a Fox v. Thomas et al
as 5:2017ct03023
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox
Defendant:
Edward Thomas, Ms. Smith, Brad Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAL v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
CREAG ELLIS, JAMES FLOYD AMMONS, JR., CARL IVARRSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Oliver Floyd
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
De Luca v. North Carolina State Board of Elections et al
as 5:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Francis X De Luca
Defendant:
North Carolina State Board of Elections , Kim Westbrook Strach , A. Grant Whitney and others
Intervenor_defendant:
League of Women Voters of North Carolina , Common Cause North Carolina , North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Amicu:
Daniel Blue, Jr. , Verla Insko , Floyd McKissick, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01349
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA C. FLOYD
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
FLOYD v. PERRY
as 1:2016cv01333
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER NATHANIEL FLOYD
Respondent:
FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Floyd v. Perry
as 5:2016hc02268
Petitioner:
Christopher Nathaniel Floyd
Respondent:
Frank Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00332
Plaintiff:
Trevylan Floyd Moore
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Loretta E. Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Baldwin v. Dudley et al
as 5:2016ct03237
Plaintiff:
Floyd Baldwin
Defendant:
Chris Dudley, R. Norris, Lewis L. Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
