Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Watson v. Furnish et al
as 1:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Gabriel Furnish, Justin Reichard, Thomas Plummer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. USA
as 3:2012cv00072
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Gabriel V Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mendoza v. USA
as 3:2012cv00073
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Gabriel V Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mendoza v. USA
as 3:2012cv00008
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Gabriel Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DKRM INC. et al v. EASTPORT OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P.
as 1:2012cv00011
Counter Defendant:
GABRIELLE G. CARINCI, DKRM INC. and OLNEY INVESTMENTS II, LLLC
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE G. CARINCI, DKRM INC. and OLNEY INVESTMENTS II, LLLC
Counter Claimant:
EASTPORT OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P.
Defendant:
EASTPORT OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HARDEN v. INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2011cv01682
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HARDEN
Defendant:
INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HERNANDEZ-CADENA v. BRACE et al
as 2:2011cv00191
Defendant:
S. BOYLAN, LT. S. BRACE, J. EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ-CADENA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ-CADENA v. BRACE et al
as 2:2011cv00163
Defendant:
S. BRACE, J. EDWARDS, H. JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ-CADENA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CADENA v. BRACE et al
as 2:2011cv00129
Defendant:
LT. S. BRACE, EDWARDS, H. JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ CADENA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Furnish et al
as 1:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
Yolanda K Powell
Defendant:
Gabriel Furnish, Brian M Jarboe, Brock Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
