Cases 61 - 70 of 1,285
BREWSTER v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wenick v. Becerra et al
as 1:2023cv02814
Plaintiff:
George D. Wenick
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi, Rose Mary Buehler and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ledet v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2023cv02840
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Judge D.V. Reynolds, Judge Charles Chesbro and Haynie Litchfield & White
Presley v. Sales
as 1:2023cv02533
Petitioner:
George Presley
Respondent:
Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BREWSTER v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Defendant:
Judge WILLIAM SMITH and JUDGE ARTHUR L SMITH, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmerman v. Gordon
as 1:2023cv02372
Plaintiff:
George Zimmerman
Defendant:
Alan Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
BREWSTER v. FORTSON et al
as 4:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Defendant:
COURTNEY FORTSON and MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSTER v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION et al
as 4:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION and Officer MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHEE v. FLIX NORTH AMERICA INC et al
as 4:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL GHEE and SAMUEL GHEE, IV
Defendant:
FLIX NORTH AMERICA INC, GREYHOUND LINES INC, GORGE MORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gueh v. George's, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01884
Plaintiff:
Tanneh Angela Gueh
Defendant:
Panda Express, Inc. and George's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
