Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Cryer v. UMass Medical, et al
as 12-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK SINCERE BLACK WOLF CRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM, TERRE K. MARSHALL, Director of Health Services, DYANA NICKI and others
:
JOHN DIAZ
Robert Saenz v. D Reeves, et al
as 11-17751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GONZALEZ SAENZ
Defendant - Appellee:
D REEVES, C. HUDSON, Appeals Coordinator, M. DAVIS, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Colon v. Fillis et al
as 4:2011cv40019
Plaintiff:
Celestino Colon
Defendant:
Charles Fillis, Thomas Ficco, Richard Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul R Jackson v. B M Cash et al
as 2:2011cv00193
Defendant:
B M Cash, B M Cash, Matthew Cate and others
Plaintiff:
Paul R Jackson
Robert Saenz v. M. Spearman, et al
as 10-17499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GONZALES SAENZ
Defendant - Appellee:
M. E. SPEARMAN, Associate Warden, D. D. REEVES, Sgt., C. HUDSON, Appeals Coordinator and others
Battista v. Clarke, et al
as 10-1965
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SANDY J. BATTISTA
Defendant - Appellant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and MICHAEL CORSINI
Defendant:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, ROBERT MURPHY, STEVE FAIRLY and others
Interested Party:
MHM SERVICES, INC.
Cryer v. UMass Medical Correctional et al
as 1:2010cv11346
Plaintiff:
Derek Sincere Black Wolf Cryer
Defendant:
UMass Medical Correctional, Terre K. Marshall, Dyana Nickl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow v. Marshall et al
as 1:2010cv03055
Cross Claimant:
Danette M. Chapman and Greyhound Bus Lines
Defendant:
Danette M. Chapman, Greyhound Bus Lines and Darnell K. Marshall
Plaintiff:
George Farrow
Cross Defendant:
Darnell K. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jason Saunders v. Alphonso A. Swaby et al
as 2:2010cv04269
Defendant:
Anise Adams, Anise Adams, A Anglin and others
Movant:
Grant
Plaintiff:
Jason Saunders
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
