Cases 61 - 70 of 131
Casey Tyler v. Katy Poole
as 19-7025
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL TORES, Captain, Individual capacity, KATY POOLE, Individual and official capacity, THORNE LOCKLEAR, Correctional officer, individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASEY RAFAEL TYLER
HARDIN v. POOLE et al
as 1:2019cv00674
Defendant:
OFFICER WHITE, OFFICER WILEY, CAPTAIN COVINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIGGS v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2019cv00644
Plaintiff:
PETER T. BRIGGS
Defendant:
CORR OFFICER GIBSON, HENRY EDWARDS, CORR. OFFICER JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Cooper v. Katy Poole
as 19-6802
Respondent / Appellee:
KATY POOLE and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY COOPER
James McNeill v. George Solomon
as 19-6639
Defendant:
GEORGE WARREN, WILLIAM BULLARD, Assistant Superintendent, KATY POOLE, Superintendent and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL TAYLOR, Assistant Superintendent, DOCTOR LOCKLEAR-JONES, SHAQUANNA M. WALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
James McNeill v. Barsha Sims
as 19-6627
Defendant:
PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR, DEAN LOCKLEAR, CAMERON GADDY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VIGO and BARSHA SIMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
FORD v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2019cv00444
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, SGT. CAMERON E. GADDY, LIEUTENANT KAREN HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
HARRIS EMANUEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAM v. POOLE et al
as 1:2019cv00376
Defendant:
PAULA Y. SMITH, SCOTLAND CORR. INST. KITCHEN, MRS/MISS OWNS and others
Plaintiff:
MANNO BEAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyles v. Poole
as 5:2019hc02090
Respondent:
Katy Poole
Petitioner:
Hildred Manuel Lyles, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCLARY v. POOLE et al
as 1:2019cv00222
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, KATY POOLE and PAM LOCKLEAR
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
