Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 439
ROANE v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00568
Petitioner: OMAR ROANE
Respondent: S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06802
Plaintiff: Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, aliqiang, XingHanQi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Franklin Jr v. Kallis
as 6:2022cv03308
Petitioner: Gordon Franklin Jr
Respondent: Steve Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LARA v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00551
Petitioner: ROBERTO LARA, JR.
Respondent: STEVEN KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kelvin Miles v. Warden Kallis, et al
as 22-3386
Petitioner / Appellant: Kelvin J. Miles
Respondent / Appellee: Warden Steve Kallis, Federal Medical Center and United States of America
LIMON v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00500
Petitioner: JUAN LIMON
Respondent: S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
YOUNG v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Petitioner: EMORY YOUNG
Respondent: S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HUGHES v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00485
Petitioner: THOMAS L. HUGHES
Respondent: S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ybarra v. Kallis
as 4:2022cv01940
Petitioner: Jeremiah Ybarra
Respondent: Warden Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert Clinkenbeard v. Steve Kallis
as 22-2923
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT JOSEPH DALE CLINKENBEARD
Respondent / Appellee: STEVE KALLIS, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?