Cases 61 - 70 of 156
Sper v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2019cv00051
Defendant:
John Tuinhoff, Lawrence A. Stelma, Michelle LaJoye-Young and others
Plaintiff:
David Sper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartger v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2018cv01221
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hartger
Defendant:
Kent County, Brandon Marz and Kent, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartlett v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 1:2018cv00157
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1109
Rosario #247823 v. Health Care (MDOC) et al
as 1:2017cv00825
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Rosario #247823
Defendant:
Health Care (MDOC), Kent County Correctional Facility and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero-Lara v. Kent County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Romero-Lara
Defendant:
Kent County Sheriff's Department and Lawrence A. Stelma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00411
Plaintiff:
Saabir Abdullah
Defendant:
United States of America, Michigan, State of and Kent County Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Abdullah v. Quist et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Saabir Abdullah
Defendant:
George Jay Quist, Kent County Courthouse, Kent County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv01290
Plaintiff:
Saabir Abdullah
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv13727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
