Cases 61 - 70 of 499
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00939
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
LADONNA V. KING and Ladonna V King
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KING v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02758
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KING v. BRODERICK et al
as 1:2020cv02828
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON, CITY OF ANDERSON and TOM BRODERICK
Plaintiff:
ANIKKA KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00670
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Bank of the Ozarks, Ford Motor Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kolby King and Mary King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2020cv01825
Defendant:
KEVIN C. SMITH, SUZANNAH WILSON OVERHOLT, PAUL RAUSCH and others
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREDERICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2020cv00187
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF WASHINGTON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLIAM FREDERICK doing business as THE KINGS OF COURT BENCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KING v. SAUL
as 4:2020cv00172
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. KING
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JONES v. MAYOR et al
as 1:2020cv01804
Defendant:
MAYOR, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JON B KING, CHIEF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
TED BELCHER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LUNDY v. SHIVERDECKER et al
as 1:2020cv01764
Defendant:
QUINTEN SHIVERDECKER and KING REAL ESTATE, LLC
Plaintiff:
RONALD LUNDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
