Cases 61 - 70 of 190
Brown et al v. MDFI Inc et al
as 7:2017mc01618
Plaintiff:
David Brown , Dayletta Chaney , Rachel Chaney and others
Defendant:
MDFI Inc , Samuel J. Hamilton at York, LLC and Mar-Jac Poultry Inc
Miscellaneou:
Bankruptcy Clerk and Jennifer H Henderson
Jarrell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Marquise Jarrell
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Easterling Correctional Facility, Walter Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson V. Jones, et al
as 1:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Lawson
Defendant:
C.O.I. Jones, Lt. Dailey, Capt. Emberton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lawson v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 4:2017cv01387
Defendant:
Service Credit Union, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Federal Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott v. Lawson et al
as 1:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Deloris Scott
Defendant:
Lawanda Lawson, Mobile Housing Board, Penelope Slawkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sullen v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Willie Arthur Sullen
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Sandra Conway, Angie Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Towles v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Rolland Sean Towles
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Jefferson Dunn and Captain Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
