Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 61 - 70 of 681
Lewis v. Challenge Mgf. Company LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00820
Plaintiff: Charles G. Lewis
Defendant: Challenge Mgf. Company LLC, Joel Borders, Rodney Penson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. Buckner
as 2:2022cv04105
Petitioner: Glen Earl Lewis
Respondent: Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinderman v. Parsons et al
as 6:2022cv03154
Plaintiff: Karl Hinderman
Defendant: Cassidy Parsons, Peter S Kirn, Pamela Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monteil et al v. Alumbaugh et al
as 4:2022cv00320
Plaintiff: Lewis Eugene Monteil and Sheryle Monteil
Defendant: Kerrick Alumbaugh, Josh Thompson and Kristen Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Vandergriff
as 4:2022cv00291
Petitioner: Divonte L Lewis
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis
as 4:2022cv00227
Plaintiff: Penny Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lewis v. Centene Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00228
Plaintiff: Penny Lewis
Defendant: Centene Corporation and MHM Health Professionals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv06029
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Paul v. Obi et al
as 2:2022cv04006
Plaintiff: Rico Ricardo Paul
Defendant: Noel Obi, Scott Kintner, Leonard Marcus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?