Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Drury v. Lowes Home Improvement, LLC
as 3:2015cv00615
Plaintiff:
Eugene Drury
Defendant:
Lowes Home Improvement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Burgett, et al v. Troy-Bilt LLC, et al
as 13-6327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BURGETT and DONNA BURGETT
Defendant - Appellee:
TROY-BILT LLC, MTD PRODUCTS, INC., LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC and others
Frantz Daniel v. Lowe's Home Improvment, LLC
as 13-11090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANTZ DANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWE'S HOME IMPROVMENT, LLC
Carroll et al v. Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Shane Quentine Carroll and Crystal Hope Carroll
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC and Scott Haden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noe v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Karen Noe
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. and Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burgett et al v. Troy-Bilt LLC et al
as 7:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Robert Burgett and Donna Burgett
Defendant:
Troy-Bilt LLC , MTD Products, Inc. , Kohler Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Debeauville v. Char-Broil, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Rene Debeauville, Jr.
Defendant:
Char-Broil, LLC and Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambers v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Clifton Chambers, Sr.
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC and Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC
as 0:2011cv61899
Plaintiff:
Frantz Daniel
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC
Mediator:
Andrew Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Burgett et al v. Troy-Bilt LLC et al
as 7:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Robert Burgett and Donna Burgett
Defendant:
Troy-Bilt LLC , MTD Products, Inc. , Kohler Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
