Cases 61 - 70 of 161
Jones v. Cherokee County Board of Education et al
as 4:2017cv01208
Plaintiff:
Rosella Jones
Defendant:
Cherokee County Board of Education and Jeffery Lane Crane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holton v. Bama Lanes Prattville, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Amanda Holton
Defendant:
Bama Lanes Prattville, LLC, Christopher Williams and Shelly Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mayo v. Capps et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Christopher Capps, Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Eggleston et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, Dana Horn Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Mayo et al (JOINT ASSIGN) (MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Samantha Alexis Mayo , Kathy Ausley , Domby Levon Ausley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Floyd(MAG2)
as 3:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kenneth Lane Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Broussard v. Watson et al
as 1:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Broussard
Defendant:
Kendrick Watson, Officer Armstrong, Officer Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broussard v. Watson et al
as 2:2016cv01568
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Broussard
Defendant:
Kendrick Watson, Armstrong, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heatherly v. Gentry et al
as 5:2016cv01433
Plaintiff:
Raymond Christopher Lee Heatherly
Defendant:
Gentry, Harris, Tosha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
