Cases 61 - 70 of 157
Kennedy v. Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Richard Daron Kennedy
Defendant:
Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office, Robin D. Scales, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perkins v. State of Alabama
as 1:2014cv00077
Petitioner:
Darnell J. Perkins
Respondent:
Leeposey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mims v. Daniel et al
as 7:2014cv00046
Petitioner:
Hasalee Mims
Respondent:
LeePosey Daniel and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton, Angie Baggett, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weeks v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Ronald Weeks
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
West v. Daniels et al (MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00912
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stephen West
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Corizon Medical Services and Leon Bolling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenow v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00563
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosenow, Jr.
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and T. Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Daniels
as 1:2013cv00386
Petitioner:
Willie Kevin Williams
Respondent:
Leeposey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ervin v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
Theophlis R. Ervin
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Charles McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Thomas et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Oden
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Leeposey Daniels, Charles McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
