Cases 61 - 70 of 146
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05616
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94685
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoskins v. Swisher et al
as 3:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Larue Love, Mr. Ren, Mr. Bedford and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75567
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patrick Richmond v. Allen Whitaker, et al
as 20-1759
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Erceg, Cedar Rapids Police Department, Michael Bailey, Cedar Rapids Police Department, Weston Wery, Cedar Rapids Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patrick Richmond
Michael Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hoskins v. Swisher et al
as 3:2020cv00302
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Bedford, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30779
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Isaac Henderson, Jr.
as 20-10022
Defendant / Appellant:
ISAAC JAMES HENDERSON, Jr., AKA Michael Bailey
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bailey v. Baker County Florida et al
as 3:2020cv00045
Defendant:
James Crews, Scott Rhoden, Duval County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
