Cases 61 - 70 of 114
Faison v. Hall
as 5:2013hc02104
Petitioner:
Moses Leon Faison
Respondent:
Joseph B. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00148
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services (ARC) et al
as 7:2012cv00306
Plaintiff:
Madeline Leigh Moses
Defendant:
American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services (ARC) , Peggy Huffman , LaShion Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TRUESDALE, et al
as 1:2012cv01054
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RONALD LEE TRUESDALE, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, LLC, CARRUTHERS & ROTH, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Moses v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Steven Moses
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hunt v. The Marshall Law Firm, P.A. et al
as 5:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Tia Hunt
Defendant:
The Marshall Law Firm, P.A. and The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
