Cases 61 - 70 of 445
Person #660430 v. Marshall
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Roderick Harold Person #660430
Defendant:
Adam Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv11319
Plaintiff:
Marshall B. Lloyd
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Porter et al v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2021cv12842
Plaintiff:
Tommy T. Porter and Sidney N. Langley
Defendant:
United States District Court, Special Operations Task Force, U.S. Probation and others
Craddock et al v. WELLPATH LLC. et al
as 2:2021cv12827
Plaintiff:
Katherine Craddock and Marshall Snyder
Defendant:
WELLPATH LLC., Macomb, County of and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cousino v. Marshall, Township of et al
as 1:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Leonard Junior Cousino
Defendant:
Marshall, Township of, Paul Anderson, Michelle L. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person Sr. #660430 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Roderick Harold Person Sr. #660430
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, MDOC Bureay of Healthcare, Adam Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv12025
Plaintiff:
Richard Dalton Lee Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Marshall SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Meisels v. GP Strategies Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv12124
Plaintiff:
Jacob Meisels
Defendant:
GP Strategies Corporation, Scott N. Greenberg, Marshall S. Geller and others
Losure v. Kalamazoo, County of et al
as 1:2021cv00552
Defendant:
Heather Marshal, Daniel Block, Kalamazoo County and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Losure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
