Cases 61 - 70 of 399
Rocco v. USA
as 3:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rocco
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Reid v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Donna Reid
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Matthew J. Budzik, Susan Quinn Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. States Attorney, et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Petitioner:
Tod Matthew Sparks, II
Respondent:
Office of States Attorney and Judicial District of Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Ashraf et al
as 3:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
William Matthews
Defendant:
Mahboob Ashraf, Sheila Baudin and Zelynette Caron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mirto et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mirto and Jennifer Mirto
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bayer Corporation, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosa v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, William Mulligan, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Pan et al
as 3:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Matthew Allen
Defendant:
Eugene Pan and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Doherty
as 3:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Matthew Allen
Defendant:
Michael Doherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ocampo v. Huang et al
as 3:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Ocampo
Defendant:
Yuanqiu Huang, Walter Michael Spader, Jr., Kent Matthew Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ramsubhag v. Sabol et al
as 3:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Devin Ramsubhag
Defendant:
Michael J. Sabol, Matthew Carpentieri, Jonathan Spagnoletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
