Cases 61 - 70 of 87
United States of America v. McLaren
as 5:2016ma00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Maximillian Magnus McLaren
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Moore v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00618
Plaintiff:
Maximillian Moore
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. McLaren
as 5:2016ma00002
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Maximillian Magnus McLaren
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Federal Trade Commission v. Adept Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00720
Defendant:
Adept Management, Inc., Anchor Publishing Group, Inc., Associated Publishers Network, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Williams v. Howell
as 2:2015cv09104
Plaintiff:
Valerie Williams
Defendant:
Maximillian Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abreu v. Nowicki
as 14-3352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeff Nowicki, Director/Unit Chief; CNYPC SOTP Program, Maureen Bosco, Executive Director; CNYPC SOTP, Mr. Cerbula, Treatment Team Leaser; CNYPC- SOTP and others
Maximillian Abreu, et al v. Dmitri Kotikovski
as 14-13774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAXIMILLIAN ABREU, DARIO SILVESTRO, MICHELLE ZAPATA, on their own behalves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DMITRI KOTIKOVSKI
Breuss et al v. Euram, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01794
Plaintiff:
Illse Breuss , Wilhelm Breuss, Jr. , Elisabeth Eberharter and others
Defendant:
Euram, Inc. , Michael P. Ladstaetter, Deborah N. Ladstaetter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abreu v. Nowicki et al
as 9:2014cv00394
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Jeff Nowicki, Maureen Bosco, Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yuglich v. Oak Street Commercial Cabinets, Inc.
as 4:2013cv02455
Plaintiff:
Maximillian Yuglich
Defendant:
Oak Street Commercial Cabinets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
