Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Miller v. Anderson et al
as 0:2008cv05327
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Miller
Defendant:
Anderson, Rios, Michael Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cupp et al
as 6:2008cv03357
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Beth Cupp, Marty C. Anderson, Michael Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nichols et al v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv02064
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Nichols and Mark J. Allen
Defendant:
USA, Harvey Lappin, Michael Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chad Bouman v. Steve Robinson, et al
as 08-3341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD D. BOUMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE ROBINSON, Unit Manager, MICHAEL JACOBS, RICARDO MARTINEZ and others
O'Hara v. Rios et al
as 0:2008cv05160
Petitioner:
Richard O'Hara
Respondent:
Ricardo Rios, Michael Nalley and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stine v. Lappin, et al
as 08-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY LAPPIN, Director BOP, MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director BOP and RON WILEY, Warden ADX Supermax
Stine, et al v. Lappin, et al
as 08-1315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND OECHSLE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, BOP, MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director, BOP and RON WILEY, Warden, ADX, Supermax
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv01506
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Felix v. Rios et al
as 0:2008cv04925
Petitioner:
Julio Felix
Respondent:
Ricardo Rios, Michael Nalley and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Reighard et al
as 6:2008cv03274
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Reighard, Marty Anderson, Michael Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
