Cases 61 - 70 of 181
Kelly et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03412
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Bernardo, Scott (I) Coddington, Karen Essendrop and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03369
Plaintiff:
Robert Sayers, Tammy Higginbotham, Melissa Niday and others
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP, Kidde PLC, Inc., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pace et al v. Lewis et al
as 2:2018cv02992
Plaintiff:
Terry L Clements and Carla J Pace
Defendant:
Neal M Johnson, S Duane Lewis, Scott Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Rynolds et al
as 4:2018cv01350
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Wolfe
Defendant:
Nfn Rynolds, Nfn Sharp, Nfn Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. American Leprosy Missions et al
as 8:2018cv01263
Plaintiff:
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
American Leprosy Missions , Gordon Eargle, Neal Eargle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Thomas v. United States of America, The
as 2:2018cv00671
Plaintiff:
Neal Gerald Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2018cv00545
Plaintiff:
Charlite Denise Neal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cline v. Horry County Solicitor's Office et al
as 4:2018cv00530
Plaintiff:
Michael J Cline
Defendant:
Horry County Solicitor's Office and O'Neal Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Neal v. Joyner
as 0:2017cv02352
Petitioner:
Craig Andre Neal
Respondent:
Warden Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
