Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Nichols v. Lewis
as 1:2010cv02446
Plaintiff:
Daryl Nichols
Defendant:
Brian Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension Fund et al v. NLG Insulation, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00918
Plaintiff:
Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension Fund , Lino Cressotti , Brian Cavey and others
Defendant:
NLG Insulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Glascoe v. Prince Georges County, Maryland et al
as 8:2010cv00710
Plaintiff:
Deirdre C. Glascoe
Defendant:
Prince Georges County, Maryland, Jack B. Johnson, Martin O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trumble et al v. E&B Isulation, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dave Trumble, Rick Pumphrey, W. Paul Stonebraker and others
Defendant:
E&B Isulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nichols v. USA
as 1:2010cv00059
Petitioner:
Darryl Nichols
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Asbestos Workers Local 24 Medical Fund et al v. Southern Insulation, Inc.
as 8:2009cv02078
Defendant:
Southern Insulation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Asbestos Workers Local 24 Medical Fund, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension Fund, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Apprenticeship Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Prince George's County, MD et al
as 8:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Parker
Defendant:
Prince George's County, MD, Stephen Nichols and Julian Alvarado
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rawlings et al v. Rabco Insulation, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01471
Plaintiff:
Carroll E. Rawlings, Alan Stortzum, Ronald S. Shegogue and others
Defendant:
Rabco Insulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
