Cases 61 - 70 of 507
Bowersock v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Bowersock, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Lexington Correctional Center and Q Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
William L Harding
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Joseph Harp Furniture Factory, Alex Lunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union, et al
as 21-6095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCOTT CROW and others
Folsom v. Walker et al
as 5:2021cv00790
Plaintiff:
Glen Folsom
Defendant:
Michael Walker, Lindsay Municipal Hospital, North Fork Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: White
as 21-7040
Petitioner:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent:
SCOTT CROW, Director Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Harris et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Branden Shane Harris, Morgan Sanders, Wesley Huff and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Geo, Shawn Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: White
as 21-7034
Petitioner:
In re: RICKEY WHITE
Respondent:
SCOTT CROW, Director Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2021cv00214
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2021cv00694
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Ray
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00661
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
