Cases 61 - 70 of 117
Howell v. McMahon et al
as 5:2014ct03100
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Duke Howell
Defendant:
Ed McMahon, William E. Owen, Does 1 - X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stone v. Scott et al
as 1:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Steven Cary Stone
Defendant:
Joanne F. Scott, David Peterson, Robert W. Hutcheson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Simmons v. Kerley et al
as 5:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Anneliese Simmons
Defendant:
Cameron Kerley , Chris Bowman and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stockton v. Wake County et al
as 5:2013ct03302
Plaintiff:
Tanya Stockton
Defendant:
Wake County , Donnie Harrison , Obinnaya C Umesi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wake County et al
as 5:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
Tanya Stockton
Defendant:
Wake County , Donnie Harrison, Obinnaya C Umesi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. INDIAN TRUST SETTLEMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00929
Plaintiff:
WILMA LYNN BUIE BROOKS
Defendant:
INDIAN TRUST SETTLEMENT and US DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN OHIO DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
MAHONEY v. MORTGAGE INVESTORS CORPORATION OF OHIO
as 1:2013cv00703
Plaintiff:
JAMES MAHONEY
Defendant:
MORTGAGE INVESTORS CORPORATION OF OHIO
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Kirkman et al v. Smith et al
as 4:2013cv00184
Defendant:
Ernest Lemuel Smith , Rodney Alan Williams and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Isaac L. Kirkman, Jr. , Kisha L. Kirkman and Isiah T. Kirkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
PALMER v. CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
LINDA PALMER
Defendant:
CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA , MICHAEL L. WELCH , COLE EDWARDS and others
Mediator:
THOMAS C. DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
