Cases 61 - 70 of 141
Buffalo de France Corp v. Arrival Air and Sea Transport Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04876
Defendant:
Arrival Air and Sea Transport Inc, Arrival Customs Brokers Ltd., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Buffalo de France Corp
Jose A. Ramirez v. Pacer Cartage, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03830
Defendant:
Pacer Cartage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Ramirez
PACER Fee Exemption Request by Sedgwick County Public Defender
as 3:2015mc00187
In Re:
PACER Fee Exemption for Sedgwick County Public Defender
Movant:
APD Jason Smartt
Gilmore v. American Basketball Association Players' Retirement Plan et al
as 3:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
Artis Gilmore
Defendant:
American Basketball Association Players' Retirement Plan , Heather Staples , San Antonio Spurs, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Watson-Harpko, LLC v. Pacer Energy Marketing, LLC
as 4:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
Watson-Harpko, LLC
Defendant:
Pacer Energy Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-51122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Calvin et al v. San Antonio Spurs, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2014cv00667
Defendant:
American Basketball Association Players' Retirement Plan, Brooklyn Nets, LLC, Pacers Basketball, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mack Calvin, William Melchionni and Claude Terry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PACER Service Center Exemption Requests and Orders
as 3:2014mc00164
In Re:
PACER Service Center Exemption Requests and Orders
Petitioner:
Western Watersheds Project
CLAYPOOL RESOURCES, LLC et al v. APL LOGISTICS, LTD. et al
as 3:2014cv01505
Plaintiff:
CLAYPOOL RESOURCES, LLC and ASAP SALES, LLC
Defendant:
APL LOGISTICS, LTD. and PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
