Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Beaty v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00076
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC , Pacific Cycle, Inc. , John Ganley and others
Plaintiff:
Tamala Beaty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matos v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv09110
Plaintiff:
Micah Matos
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Pacific Cycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matos v. Target Corporation et al
as 7:2010cv09110
Plaintiff:
Micah Matos
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Pacific Cycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee Peterson v. Target Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv01772
Defendant:
Does, National Product Services, Pacific Cycle Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Peterson
C.M.K. et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00115
Plaintiff:
C.M.K. , Stephanie Klug and John Klug
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. and Pacific Cycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv05063
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. CLARK and KATHLEEN CLARK
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP , WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
M William Capital Inc. et al v. Pacific Cycle Inc.
as 1:2010cv00703
Plaintiff:
M William Capital Inc. , M W Capital LLC , Meredith Birrittella and others
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boeck v. Pacific Cycle, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00667
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boeck
Defendant:
Pacific Cycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ventura v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01146
Plaintiff:
Ludivine Ventura
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worley v. Target Corporations et al
as 3:2010cv00253
Plaintiff:
Tony Worley
Defendant:
Target Corporations and Pacific Cycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
