Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Gardner v. Harvard Collection Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03286
Plaintiff: Necole Gardner
Defendant: Harvard Collection Services, Inc. , Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC and John Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barnes v. Harvard Collection Services Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00382
Plaintiff: Erica Barnes
Defendant: Harvard Collection Services Inc. , Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01534
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00492
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05982
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv01955
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GONZALEZ v. AFFILIATE ASSET SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01843
Defendant: AFFILIATE ASSET SOLUTIONS, LLC and PENDRICK CAPITAL PARTNERS, II, LLC
Plaintiff: FRANSOLY GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01437
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02690
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01341
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?