Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Rivers v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n et al
as 1:2012cv02829
Plaintiff:
Pennelope Rivers
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Ass'n , PHH Mortgage Corp and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv06108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151
Brazell v. PHH Mortgage Corp., et al
as 12-4047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT V. BRAZELL
Defendant - Appellee:
PHH MORTGAGE CORP., MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT CORPORATION, AARON MICHAEL WAITE, as Trustee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lastra v. PHH Mortgage Corp. et al
as 3:2010cv02573
Plaintiff:
Maria Lastra
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corp. , Clayton Goff and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Williams et al v. Banco Popular et al
as 2:2010cv07398
Defendant:
Banco Popular, Does, NID Housing Couseling Agency and others
HUD:
Department of Housing and Urban Development
MERS:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Co.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams and Bukeka Williams
Deane G Kaminski v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv01468
Defendant:
DOES, Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation, NDEx West LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deane G Kaminski
Keven L. Roark v. PHH Mortgage Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv04460
Defendant:
Jeremiah Roshan Briggs, Craig Matthew Clark, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Plaintiff:
Keven L. Roark
Smokey Hill Farm Inc et al v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corp et al
as 3:2010cv00869
Plaintiff:
Smokey Hill Farm Inc , Smokey Hill Farm LLC and Magnus Lindholm
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Credit Corp, Merrill Lynch Corp, PHH Mortgage Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01349
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
