Cases 61 - 70 of 403
Green et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01684
Plaintiff:
Phillip Richard Green and Wanda L. Green
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv01741
Petitioner:
Phillip Peterson
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniel Hine, III et al v. State of Maryland, et al.
as 1:2020cv01285
Plaintiff:
Cocobuns Tanning Inc. and Daniel Hine, III
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Robert J. Neall, Michael T. Pedone and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01129
Defendant:
Deputy Secretary Frances Phillips, Secretary Robert Neall, Lawrence Governor Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antietam Battlefield et al v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01130
Plaintiff:
Rev. James Wickham, Delegate Warren Miller, David Serenda and others
Defendant:
Woodrow W. Jones, III, Frances B. Phillips, Robert J. Neall and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cutler
Amicus Curiae:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole et al v. Prickett et al
as 1:2020cv00990
Defendant:
Randall Scott Ringler, Triple Advantage Outdoors, LLC and Charles Phillip Prickett
Plaintiff:
Triple Advantage Group, LLC and Trent J. Cole, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillip v. Saul
as 8:2020cv00896
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillip
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillips v. Maryland Board of Law Examiners et al
as 1:2020cv00583
Defendant:
Matthew Mills, David Ralph, Jonathan Azrael and others
Plaintiff:
Solon Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MediGrow LLC v. Natalie M LaPrade Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission et al
as 1:2020cv00504
Defendant:
M.D. Elizabeth Q Hines, M.D. C Obi Onyewu, Saundra O Washington and others
Plaintiff:
MediGrow LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
