Cases 61 - 70 of 426
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mays v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2021cv00332
Plaintiff:
Vernon Mays
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Peter Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ASHLOCK v ROGATNICK et al
as 2:2021cv00286
Defendant:
WALTER BRYAN ASHLOCK, ROGATNICK, CINDY MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
PETER DJUAN DONTRELL PARKER
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BERRY GLOBAL/BERRY PLASTICS, LAWMAN TACTICAL SECURITY & CONSULTING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUPAL v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01997
Plaintiff:
PETER CUPAL
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv01833
Defendant:
SOUTHEAST HEALTH CENTER, PETER KIM and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
BRENDA L WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SCHREANE v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00251
Defendant:
G. PETERS, T.J. WATSON, G. GORE and others
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANGONE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01745
Plaintiff:
PETER ANGONE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLABAUGH v. CHURCHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION IV et al
as 1:2021cv01652
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLEIN, ATIEVA, INC. doing business as LUCID MOTORS, PETER RAWLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. SLABAUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLASHKA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01670
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PETER BLASHKA
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
