Cases 61 - 70 of 657
Smith v. Wellpath Healthcare et al
as 2:2023cv10075
Plaintiff:
Airick Trammell Smith
Defendant:
Wellpath Healthcare, Gary Miniard, Christina Wilson and others
VHS of Michigan, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv10055
Plaintiff:
VHS of Michigan, Inc. d/b/a Detroit Medical Center and VHS of Michigan, Inc. re: Peter Duato Doing business as Detroit Medical Center
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Schmidtke v. Bridgman Public Schools et al
as 1:2022cv01186
Plaintiff:
Schmidtke Steven and Steven Schmidtke
Defendant:
Bridgman Public Schools, Superintendent Shane Peters, Athletic Director Ken Schmaltz and others
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bartko v. Goetz et al
as 4:2022cv12985
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bartko and Gregory Bartko [E-Filer]
Defendant:
Michael Goetz, Dina P. Dajani, Mark A. Armitage and others
Lyoya v. Schurr et al
as 1:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
Peter Lyoya
Defendant:
Christopher Schurr and Grand Rapids, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
lyoya v. City of Grand Rapids et al
as 1:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
peter lyoya
Defendant:
City of Grand Rapids and david shcurr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Arrington v. Mazen et al
as 2:2022cv12766
Plaintiff:
Shrondrey Arrington
Defendant:
Mazen, Peters, Blanden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Delgrosso v. Hemingway et al
as 2:2022cv12720
Petitioner:
Philip Delgrosso
Respondent:
Jonathan Hemingway and Collette Peters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
