Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Carter v. Biddings et al
as 4:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Elmer L Carter
Defendant:
Angela Biddings, Stowe, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Holladay et al
as 4:2009cv00419
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Kelly Paxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Holladay et al
as 4:2009cv00418
Plaintiff:
Bobby Johnson
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Kelly Paxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staley et al v. Morgan et al
as 4:2009cv00386
Plaintiff:
Larry Leroy Staley and Jamoca Taiye Price
Defendant:
Randy Morgan, Martin, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Holliday et al
as 4:2009cv00369
Plaintiff:
Cleaster Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Doc Holliday, Randy Morgan, Shawn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElyea v. Holliday et al
as 4:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
James David McElyea
Defendant:
Doc Holliday, Randy Morgan, Shawn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vandermolen v. Holladay et al
as 4:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Shane Marcus Vandermolen, Sr
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan and Shawn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rockamore v. Johnson et al
as 4:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
Robert K Rockamore, Jr
Defendant:
Johnson, Bob Barker Co Inc, Charles Doc Holladay and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 5:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Vincent Sharnee Johnson
Defendant:
Edward Earl Adams, Randy Morgan, Carl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McIntosh v. Holladay et al
as 4:2008cv04218
Plaintiff:
Trimell Deshawn McIntosh
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan and Shawn Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
