Cases 61 - 70 of 143
Rivera v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019cv04711
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noco Company v. Rivera
as 1:2019cv01933
Defendant:
Marissa Rivera
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01400
Plaintiff:
Edmanuel Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Transtar Industries, LLC v. Lester, et al.
as 1:2019cv01230
Defendant:
TranzDepot, LLC, Chadd Lester, Cary Young and others
Plaintiff:
Transtar Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis et al v. VXI Global Solutions, LLC
as 4:2019cv00871
Plaintiff:
Cathilia Whitmore, Shaclecha Stoddard, Kanika Vaughn and others
Defendant:
VXI Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rivera v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00883
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $59,996.00 in Money Orders et al
as 1:2018cv02007
Defendant:
$20,970.00 in U.S. Currency and $59,996.00 in Money Orders
Claimant:
Anthony B. Rivera
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Rivera v. Mandros et al
as 3:2018cv01677
Defendant:
Lori L. Olender, Neil Stewart McElroy, Denise A. Dartt and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Rivera v. Cengage Learning, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01310
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rivera
Defendant:
Cengage Learning, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Shust v. AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01129
Plaintiff:
Nestor Shust
Defendant:
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., Donald T. DeCarlo, Susan C. Fisch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
